Meeting Time, Site Update
Tutorial Page Fixed
2.2 Release
2.1.1 Release
Codehaus Saga

 <rschulz> 2) wiki issue with tutorial page appears to have been solved - thanks to whoever fixed it
 <jdeolive> the meeting was supposed to be at 11, so we are pretty late
 <rschulz> 11 PST?
 <jdeolive> yup
 <jdeolive> not sure where it says that one the site
 <rschulz> the wiki says 11:30 pst, I will change it
 <jdeolive> one sec, maybe it is 11:30
 <jdeolive> actually no it was changed
 <jdeolive> 11 is good
 <rschulz> jody experimented with 12:00 pst before leaving, but we do not know if any change was adopted
 <rschulz> I will email the devel list tonight to sort out the time
 <rschulz> ok note written to myself, on to next topic?
 <jdeolive> good, thanks reuben
 <jdeolive> sure
 <jdeolive> i think we can thank jody for the fix
 <desruisseaux> Agenda topic proposal: Geotools 2.2 release?
 <jdeolive> good, you beat me to that one martin
 <jdeolive> 3) 2.2 Release
 <jdeolive> i think 2 is done, desruisseaux would you liek to start us off?
 <desruisseaux> I'm in the process of moving test files around, in the hope to get a smaller 2.2 source code download (and also a smaller SVN repository).
 <desruisseaux> I'm about to delete (in the next commit) the 50 Mb image and the 8 Mb zip file, and commented-out the test (in GeoTIFF and GTOPO30 modules) until someone put smaller images in place.
 <jdeolive> i beleive jody got the last change he wanted (moving rendering out) in as well
 <desruisseaux> Yes, renderer is in its own module and seems to work well.
 <jdeolive> good
 <desruisseaux> I'm also about to move many shape files in the sample-data module, and modified the test suite in order to pickup their shape files there. This avoid to copy the same shapefiles again and again, especially statepop which is used as a test file in many different modules.
 <jdeolive> so is there anything else that we are waiting on for 2.2 besided some reorganization?
 <desruisseaux> No. I hope to finish that in the next few days.
 <Jesse_eichar> Maybe merge indexed-shapefile into shapefile?
 <Jesse_eichar> so only 1 plugin?
 <desruisseaux> That would be very nice!! Do we have a volunter for that?
 <Jesse_eichar>
 <Jesse_eichar> sure
 <jdeolive> that would be nice, jesse do you have an estimate of how much work + risk
 -->| jgarnett (n=chatzill@mail.refractions.net) has joined #geotools
 -->| rgould (n=rgould@mail.refractions.net) has joined #geotools
 <jgarnett> (hi #) Codehaus - if it is not on already)
 <Jesse_eichar> It isn't a big job.  I would basically leave everything alone.  It is all packaged so the two plugins can be merged with no conflicts.
 <desruisseaux> Before to start any work on merging indexed-shapefile into shapefile, could you just wait that I commit my changes in the test suite? It should be done in the next few hours.
 <Jesse_eichar> I wouldn't start until tomorrow or the next day.
 <desruisseaux> Actually, my work is already done but I'm just unable to commit it right now because of a network problem.
 <desruisseaux> Okay, nice
 <jdeolive> ok so jesse why dont you email the list and describe your change, the turnaround time will give martin some time to commit his stuff
 <Jesse_eichar> ok
 <jgarnett> here is a silly idea of "Stuff before" 2.2.RC0 - did we want module/xml w/ dzwiers as module maintainer? He is not here but he may like the idea ... I recall he was unhappy w/ someof his work being placed in module/main
 <jdeolive> so shall i send the message to get the 2.2 release ball moving, and ask if anyone has any proposed changes to get in?
 <jdeolive> its too bad we met late, he probably was here
 <jdeolive> i would say unless you responds to what to get in, leave it as is
 <jdeolive> you = dzwiers
 <jgarnett> (BTW - I fixed the meeting time on the website)
 <jgarnett> Did you guys follow the codehaus saga?
 <jdeolive> can we stay on the 2.2 release topic, we can make that 4
 <jdeolive> 4) Codehaus Update
 <jgarnett> 5) 2.1.1.RC0
 <desruisseaux> I'm done with 2.2 topic. Just a lost not saying that when everything will be in place (shapefiles modules merged, maybe module/xml), I would like to add something like a @source $URL$ javadoc tag (or any other javadoc tag is someone has proposal).
 <desruisseaux> (typo: "just a last note saying...")
 <jdeolive> ok so if that is it I will send the proposed change message to the list, jesse can respond with the shapefile request, and we can get the release ball rolling perhaps early next week?
 <jgarnett> the @source tag sounds fine ... we can vote on it if you want?
 <desruisseaux> Well... If nobody object, I think that we can go without a vote?
 <rschulz> (I need to attend another meeting at ubc - I will read the logs tonight - bye)
 <jdeolive> bye reuben, thanks for attending
 <jgarnett> Um so where are we in the agenda? Done w/ 2.2.x?
 <desruisseaux> Done on my side.
 <jdeolive> yup, all done
 <jdeolive> so jody 4) Codehaus Saga Update
 <desruisseaux> I'm curious
 <jgarnett> Some of our pages were creted by a user (me actually) that was since deleted (they could not figure out permissions)
 <jgarnett> those pages now die with a null point exception.
 <jgarnett> Since I started the website the pages are the important ones Developers Guide and Tutorials
 <jgarnett> They have a bug report sent off to the makers of Confluence.
 <jgarnett> I may try hacking the "page layouts" so that the origional author is not written out (but I doubt that will save us).
 <jgarnett> I have made a page: DEVEL that has the same contents as "Developers Guide"
 <jgarnett> (note the page that is troubled is id 3111 - you can edit it by hand, just not look at it).
 <jgarnett> That is kind of - it. Nothing more that can be done. If we caught this when they updated we may have got them to delay ... but nobody on our side noticed.
 <jgarnett> Comments, suggestions, or anyone with an australian address that can bribe them with beer?
 <jgarnett> So yeah - we are scr*wed - and this agenda item is done.
 <jdeolive> alright, last agenda item 2.1.1.RC0
 <jgarnett> I am trying abuild on my new laptop, I will release it when done. Justin is looking into a Postgis test failure.
 <jdeolive> probably time this with 2.2.RC0?
 <jdeolive> should be fixed now
 <jgarnett> Well I will make it, you can try your GeoServer release on it? And we can make 2.1.1 with your final release ...
 <jgarnett> (just want to check that we can still release this thing ...)
 <jdeolive> that sounds good
 <jgarnett> Q: Last published meeting was Dec 19th - have we had no meetings since then?
 <jdeolive> alright i think that is it
 <jdeolive> the meeting proper can end now