Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

As seen by the Transport API Review page, most projects have very similar concepts in dealing with their messages and flows. There are many advantages if everyone used the same API:

  • Reusable transports across projects - For instance, if I wrote a TCP transport, it would then work in ServiceMix, Tuscan, XFire, Celtix, etc
  • Reusable interceptors across projects
  • Less duplicate code
  • Improve project cross pollination
  • By standardizing on an API, it may make it easier for people to contribute to the additional projects - provided we can write some documentation.

(For lack of imagination, I titled this Universal Transport API for now - DD)


  • A message concept which isn't tied to any particular representation
  • A message exchange pattern representation
  • A way to interact with Sessions that might be tied to transports?
  • An interceptor/handler architecture

Use Cases

  • No labels