That statement sums up the principle behind this rule. However, there are more pragmatic reasons to consider as well.
Clarity / Evident Data
Often the motivation for accessing files from a unit test is to read test data upon which the class under test depends. Separating test data from the code of your test makes that test significantly harder to understand and debug. Kent Beck refers to this unit testing best practice as Evident Data. Show the reader of your test the intent of the code being tested by using clear and understandable data as parameters. Once you move that data into a separate file, especiall in binary formats, the maintenance cost and usefulness of that test becomes significantly worse.
Speed Of Execution
Reading files is much slower than executing code. Most
Ease of Setup and Brittleness Issues
Unit tests that depend on files being in the right place in order to pass can no longer be executed simply with a test runner and proper classpath. They must be executed in the context of a build which ensures that the files used are in the right place to be read by the test. This raises maintenance concerns, since changes to the test files would cause your unit tests to break in possibly hard-to-understand ways.
Most of the time what you really care about is streams. Your design should be flexible enough to deal with other sources than files. By accounting for this you will also get a more flexible design.
- Design all classes that have a legitimate need to read files be coupled to the rest of your codebase via interfaces.
- In some cases, consider using URLs instead of File classes. URLs have handlers which can be mocked out quite easily.
- Create a separate, non-Ashcroft integration test suite with tests to cover implementations that read files.