Gold Star Quality Assurance Check:
IP Check: need to ensure all headers are in place
Releasable: no blocking issues
Quality Assurance: 84.9% test coverage reported by clover
Stability: based on reviewed GeoAPI Filter interfaces and reviewed CSW 2.0.1 BNF for CQL
user and design docs. Module maintainer does watches user list, answers email.
A module dedicated to fully support the OGC Common Query Language, version 2.0.1, as a query predicate language inside GeoTools.
Axios has developed, for the Gipuzkoa Provincial Council, Mobility and Land Planning Department, an implementation of the OGC Catalog Service for Web 2.0.1 specification, based on GeoAPI medatada interfaces and Geotools implementation to support the ISO-19115/19139 profile.
The CSW specification, in section 6.2.2 defines the complete BNF for a constraint language to use as query predicates in a CSW implementation, named OGC Common Query Language, CQL for short.
As the CSW implementation worked on uses exclusively
org.opengis.filter.Filter, it was needed a converter from an input query in CQL format to an equivalent predicate in the form of a Filter object.
By being part of the GeoTools library, this little module would just allow for any client code to easily construct a filter from a more human friendly predicate language.
In particular, the GeoServer community is currently willing to use it to add friendly filtering capabilities in WMS GetMap requests, and I guess it could be used in WFS GetFeature too.
An example usage would be:
Ofcourse the quoted text after
CONSTRAINT=should be properly encoded for HTTP
The module is derived from the old org.geotools.filter.ExpressionBuilder parser by Ian Schneider.
The focus was to fully support the 2.0.1 version of the BNF as defined in the CSW spec. This implies, among other improvements:
- support for nested and prefixed property names (for example,
- support for spatial predicates (intersect, touches, etc). Note the BNF oddly suppressed the trailing 's' from these predicates, so
TOUCH(ATTR1, POINT(1 2))instead of
TOUCHES(ATTR1, POINT(1 2))
- temporal predicates (BEFORE, AFTER, DURING, etc)
Unit test coverage
The module targets a high level code coverage for unit testing, 80% minimum.
Unit testing strategy
We made a full test coverage. Had to throw away the unit tests of the old
ExpressionBuilder since they were testing that the resulting Filter or Expression evaluates to an expected value, which was a wrong way of testing the parser. The correct way is to ensure that the Filter is built as expected. For example:
This doesn't asserts the built Filter is a "att is less than 10" Filter.
The module is in good health. No self or transient issues preventing it from compiling and passing tests.