| Table of Contents |
Complexity
| Name | Key | Description |
| Complexity | It is the cyclomatic complexity, also known as McCabe metric. Whenever the control flow of a method splits, the complexity counter gets incremented by one. | |
| Complexity /class | class_complexity | Average complexity by class. |
| Complexity /file | file_complexity | Average complexity by file. |
| Complexity /method | function_complexity | Average complexity by method. |
Design
| Name | Key | Description |
Afferent couplings | ca | A class afferent couplings is a measure of how many other classes use the specific class. |
Depth in Tree | dit | The depth of inheritance tree (DIT) metric provides for each class a measure of the inheritance levels from the object hierarchy top. |
Efferent couplings | ce | A class efferent couplings is a measure of how many different classes are used by the specific class. |
File cycles | file_cycles | Minimal number of file cycles detected inside a package to be able to identify all undesired dependencies. |
File edges weight | file_edges_weight | Number of file dependencies inside a package. |
File dependencies to cut | package_tangles | Number of file dependencies to cut in order to remove all cycles between packages. |
File tangle | file_tangles | File tangle = Suspect file dependencies |
File tangle index | file_tangle_index | File tangle index = 2 * (File tangle / File edges weight) * 100.
|
LCOM4 | lcom4 | Lack of cohesion of methods. See LCOM4 documentation page. |
Number of children | noc | The number of children of a class is the number of direct and indirect descendants of this class. |
Package cycles | package_cycles | Minimal number of package cycles detected to be able to identify all undesired dependencies. |
Package dependencies to cut | package_feedback_edges | Number of package dependencies to cut in order to remove all cycles between packages. |
Package tangle index | package_tangle_index | Level of tangle of the packages. Best value (0%) means that there is no cycle and worst value (100%) means that packages are really tangled. This metric is computed with the following formula: 2 * (File dependencies to cut / Number of file dependencies between packages) * 100. |
Response for class | rfc | See RFC documentation page. |
Package edges weight | package_edges_weight | Number of file dependencies between packages. |
Suspect file dependencies | file_feedback_edges | File dependencies to cut in order to remove cycles between files inside a package. Note that cycles between files inside a package does not always mean a bad quality architecture. |
| Suspect LCOM4 density | Density of files having a LCOM4 density greater than 1. |
Documentation
| Name | Key | Description |
| Blank comments | Number of non-significant comment lines (empty comment line, comment line containing only special characters, etc.). | |
| Comment lines | comment_lines | Number of single-comment of multi-comment lines. Comment lines like file headers (mainly used to define license) are not included. |
| Comments (%) | comment_lines_density | Density of comment lines = Comment lines / (Lines of code + Comment lines) * 100 With such a formula:
|
| Comments in Procedure Divisions | Comments in Procedure divisions (Cobol only) | |
| Public documented API (%) | public_documented_api_density | Density of public documented API = (Public API - Public undocumented API) / Public API * 100 |
| Public undocumented API | public_undocumented_api | Public API without comments header. |
Duplications
| Name | Key | Description |
Duplicated blocks | duplicated_blocks | Number of duplicated blocks of lines. |
| Duplicated files | duplicated_files | Number of files involved in a duplication. |
| Duplicated lines | duplicated_lines | Number of lines involved in a duplication. |
| Duplicated lines (%) | duplicated_lines_density | Density of duplication = Duplicated lines / Lines * 100 |
Reviews
| Name | Key | Description |
Active reviews |
| Number of active reviews (status not closed). |
| False-positive reviews | Number fo false-positive reviews. | |
| New unreviewed violations | Number of new unreviewed violations. | |
| Unassigned reviews | Number of unassigned reviews. | |
| Unplanned reviews | Number of unplanned reviews (not associated with an action plan). | |
| Unreviewed violations | Number of unreviewed violations. |
Rules
| Name | Key | Description |
New violations | new_violations | Number of new violations. |
New xxxxx violations | new_xxxxx_violations | Number of new violations with severity xxxxx, xxxxx being Blocker, Critical, Major, Minor or Info. |
Violations | violations | Number of violations. |
xxxxx violations | xxxxx_violations | Number of violations with severity xxxxx, xxxxx being Blocker, Critical, Major, Minor or Info. |
Weighted violations | weighted_violations | Sum of the violations weighted by the coefficient associated to each severity (Sum(xxxxx_violations * xxxxx_weight)). |
Rules compliance | violations_density | Rules compliance index (RCI) = 100 - (Weighted violations / Lines of code * 100) |
SCM
| Name | Key | Qualitative | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors by line | authors_by_line | no | The last committer on each line of code. |
Note that this metric is made available by the SCM Activity plugin.
SQALE
| Metric | Key | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Blocker Remediation Cost | Remediation cost (in days) to fix all blocker violations.
| |
| Critical and over Remediation Cost | Remediation cost (in days) to fix all critical and blocker violations. | |
| Effort to grade X | Effort (in days) to reach grade X. | |
| Major and over Remediation Cost | Remediation cost (in days) to fix all major and critical and blocker violations. | |
| Minor and over Remediation Cost | Remediation cost (in days) to fix all minor and major and critical and blocker violations. | |
| SQALE Remediation Cost | Remediation cost (in days) to fix all violations. |
Note that these metrics are made available by the SQALE plugin.
Size
| Metric | Key | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accessors | accessors | Number of getter and setter methods used to get (reading) or set (writing) a class property. |
| Classes | classes | Number of classes (including nested classes, interfaces, enums and annotations). |
| Directories | directories | Number of directories. |
| Files | files | Number of files. |
| Generated Lines | Number of lines generated by Cobol code generators like CA-Telon. | |
| Generated lines of code | Number of lines of code generated by Cobol code generators like CA-Telon. | |
| Inside Control Flow Statements | (Cobol only) | |
| Lines | lines | Number of physical lines (number of carriage returns). |
| Lines of code | ncloc | Number of physical lines that contain at least one character which is neither a whitespace or a tabulation or part of a comment. |
| LOCs in Data Divisions | Number of lines of code in Data divisions (Cobol only). | |
| LOCs in Procedure Divisions | Number of lines of code in Procedure divisions (Cobol only). | |
| Methods | functions | Number of methods. |
| Outside Control Flow Statements | (Cobol only) | |
| Packages | packages | Number of packages. |
| Projects | projects | Number of projects in a view. |
| Public API | public_api | Number of public Classes + number of public Methods + number of public Properties |
| Statements | statements | Number of statements. |
Tests
| Metric | Key | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Branch coverage | branch_coverage | On each line of code containing some boolean expressions, the branch coverage simply answers the following question: 'Has each boolean expression been evaluated both to true and false?'. This is the density of possible branches in flow control structures that have been followed during unit tests execution. |
| Coverage | coverage | It is a mix of Line coverage and Branch coverage. Its goal is to provide an even more accurate answer to the following question: 'How much of the source code has been covered by the unit tests?". |
| Line coverage | line_coverage | On a given line of code, Line coverage simply answers the following question: 'Has this line of code been executed during the execution of the unit tests?'. It is the density of covered lines by unit tests: |
| Lines to cover | lines_to_cover | Number of lines of code which could be covered by unit tests (for example, blank lines or full comments lines are not considered as lines to cover). |
| New branch coverage | new_branch_coverage | Identical to Branch coverage but restricted to new / updated source code. |
| New coverage | new_coverage | Identical to Coverage but restricted to new / updated source code. |
| New line coverage | new_line_coverage | Identical to Line coverage but restricted to new / updated source code. |
| New lines to cover | new_lines_to_cover | Identical to Lines to cover but restricted to new / updated source code. |
| New uncovered lines | new_uncovered_lines | Identical to Uncovered lines but restricted to new / updated source code. |
| Skipped unit tests | skipped_tests | Number of skipped unit tests. |
| Uncovered branches | uncovered_branches | Number of branches which are not covered by unit tests. |
| Uncovered lines | uncovered_lines | Number of lines of code which are not covered by unit tests. |
| Unit tests | tests | Number of unit tests. |
| Unit tests duration | test_execution_time | Time required to execute all the unit tests. |
| Unit test errors | test_errors | Number of unit tests that have failed. |
| Unit test failures | test_failures | Number of unit tests that have failed with an unexpected exception. |
| Unit test success density (%) | test_success_density | Test success density = (Unit tests - (Unit test errors + Unit test failures)) / Unit tests * 100 |
The same kinds of metrics exist for Integration tests coverage and Overall tests coverage (Units tests + Integration tests).
Metrics on tests execution does not exist for Integration tests and Overall tests.

