Motivation: |
Stepping up from a pure 2d world to partial 3d support, the OGR,PostGIS,MapServer way |
|
|---|---|---|
Contact: |
||
Tracker: |
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2537 | |
Tagline: |
|
This page represents the current plan; for discussion please check the tracker link above.
|
At the time of writing GeoTools is aggressively making sure only 2 dimensional data enters feature geometries. In particular, in most data sources that might have a 3D component the code is flattening the coordinates so that only the horizontal component is provided.
Coordinate reference systems are always 2 dimensional, too. Finally, only 2 dimensional geometry types are handled (JTS types).
On the other side of the 3D support spectrum there are 3 or more dimensional coordinate reference systems (fully 3D, or compound), 3D coordinates and solid geometries (such as spheres, cones, boxes).
This proposal attempts to bring some 3D support into GeoTools, to the extent that is already covered by various other software.
In particular, the geometry coordinates will be allowed three (or more) dimensions, whilst the coordinate reference system used will still be two dimensional. This approach is already followed by various software around:
All the above systems make no different between a Z and a M (measure), basically handling every dimension past the first two as sort of out of band information that does not get transformed when the first two dimensions are.
In particular, coordinate system transformations do change the planar part whilst the extra dimensions are carried over unaltered.
The proposed changes to the GeoTools code base are relatively small:
The topic has already been publicly discussed on the mailing list in this thread: http://n2.nabble.com/Handling-2D%2B1-data-in-GeoTools-td2739186.html#a2739186
This proposal is under construction.
Voting has not started yet:
This section is used to make sure your proposal is complete (did you remember documentation?) and has enough paid or volunteer time lined up to be a success
|
no progress |
|
done |
|
impeded |
|
lack mandate/funds/time |
|
volunteer needed |
|---|
Updating the datastores to allow returning the third dimension is an activity that can be performed in time, a datastore that keeps behaving as before won't be broken by the changes and won't affect client code either (it will just miss the ability to return multidimensional data).
Since access to coordinate dimensions is explicit and JTS always offered a Z in the Coordinate class, no real change in the user code is needed. Only, if certain code absolutely needs 2D data, it will have to pass down the FEATURE_2D hint, like this:
FeatureSource fs = ...;
DefaultQuery q = new DefaultQuery("my3dType");
q.setHints(new Hints(Hints.FEATURE_2D, true));
FeatureCollection coll = fs.getFeatures(q);
|
Also, it is expected ReferencedEnvelope to gain support for further dimensions. The interface is already n-dimensional capable, but fields will need to be added to support dimensions over the first two.