Motivation: | FeatureCollection is not a java.util.Collection | |
|---|---|---|
Contact: | ||
Tracker: | ||
Tagline: |
|
This page represents the current plan; for discussion please check the tracker link above.
|
FeatureCollection needs to lighten up to be happy; the original FeatureCollection implementation was a java.util.Collection offering iterator based access to features stored in memory. When the data access layer was rewritten for DataStore the concept of a FeatureResults was introduced wich could be thought of as a "prepared statement" (able to fetch results each time it was asked). This is a nice light weight "streaming" model for data access that does not force us to load the data into memory.
The intension was to treat it a bit more like a Java ResultSet (so several iterators could be open against the same paged results). But the road to hell is paved with good intensions.
And the FeatureResults interface was in for some hell: 2.1.x Bring Back FeatureCollection was a last ditch community lead request to bring back the FeatureCollection api and allow iterators to be used (thus not existing current code). The compromise that was reached was to ask users to FeatureCollection.close( Iterator ) each iterator after use; so that we could still offer a nice streaming based approach to data access.
For GeoTools 2.5.x we made the migration to Java 5 and we could no longer allow FeatureCollection to implement java.util.Collection because of the new "for each" syntax did not offer a callback for us to close our iterators. Justin started Focus FeatureSource around FeatureReader and FeatureWriter, however all we had time for was the bare minimum to make Java 5 not a fatal opportunity for client code to leak memory.
In the spirit of Bring Back FeatureCollection here is our last minuet 2.7.x request to complete the journey; formally recognise that FeatureCollection is not a java.util.Collection and turf Iterator access (and other concepts that mirror in memory storage).
First up is the add/remove listeners; a recent code review shows that they are only implemented by the new JDBCNG FeatureCollection (because justin is apparently very responsible). Due to everyone else not being responsible we can safely remove these since no client code could of depended on being sent an event.
addListener(CollectionListener) |
Note: These listeners have been deprecated as part of Clean up FeatureEvents since this proposal was written.
FeatureCollections.newCollection
Currently FeatureCollections.newCollection returns a SimpleFeatureCollection. Many code examples populate this feature collection using the add method.
SimpleFeatureCollection collection = FeatureCollections.newCollection(); collection.add( feature ); // <-- WILL NOT WORK! |
The most expidient fix is to create a new DefaultFeatureCollection directly (this is the implementation returned by newCollection() above).
DefaultFeatureCollection collection = new DefaultFeatureCollection(); collection.add( feature ); |
DefaultFeatureCollection is a FeatureCollection that implements java.util.Collection . This is the current migration path for those wishing to have an in memory collection.
DataUtilities.collection
Asking for your feature collection to be "loaded" into a FeatureCollection is the currently documented way of avoiding all this streaming nonsense and loading your data into memory.
SimpleFeatureCollection collection = DataUtilities.collection( featureCollection ); |
If we find a lot of users go on to call add we can change the DataUtilities.collection methods to explicitly return a DefaultFeatureCollectionOption.
Alternatives
We may also wish to consider a different implementation for DefaultFeatureCollection:
The following methods cover the care and feeding of Iterators:
void close(FeatureIterator<SimpleFeature>) Iterator<SimpleFeature> iterator() void close(Iterator<SimpleFeature>); void purge() |
We are removing the close(FeatureIterator) method as well as it already has a serviceable FeatureIterator.close() method (the method was only provided to ease transition to FeatureIterator).
The following methods are used to update and modify the contents of an in memory Collection and do not fit with the "Prepaired Statement" model of a FeatureCollection.
// modification of in memory feature collections // (recommend using featuresource instead) boolean add(SimpleFeature) boolean addAll(Collection<? extends SimpleFeature>) boolean addAll(FeatureCollection<? extends SimpleFeatureType, ? extends SimpleFeature>) boolean clear() boolean remove(Object) boolean removeAll(Collection<?>) boolean retainAll(Collection<?>) |
This is a long standing hole in the API, proposal written in response to questions from Ben: FeatureCollection Descriptor for FeatureMembers
It sounds like this is just an additional method:
AttributeDescriptor getDescriptor(); FeatureType getSchema(); |
Consider making the API consistent with a getType() method? Does not seem worth the bother.
Tasks:
Here is what SimpleFeatureCollection looks like after the change:
public interface SimpleFeatureCollection extends FeatureCollection<SimpleFeatureType,SimpleFeature> {
// feature access - close when done!
SimpleFeatureIterator features();
// feature access with out the loop
void accepts(FeatureVisitor, ProgressListener);
// metadata
String getID();
SimpleFeatureType getSchema();
AttributeDescriptor getDescriptor(); // pending prosal
// sub query
SimpleFeatureCollection subCollection(Filter);
SimpleFeatureCollection sort(SortBy);
boolean contains(Object);
boolean containsAll(Collection<?>);
// summary information
ReferencedEnvelope getBounds();
boolean isEmpty();
int size();
// convert to array
Object[] toArray();
<O> O[] toArray(O[]);
}
|
Points raised during discussion:
public interface SimpleFeatureCollection extends FeatureCollection<SimpleFeatureType,SimpleFeature> {
SimpleFeatureIterator features();
String getID();
SimpleFeatureType getSchema();
ReferencedEnvelope getBounds();
boolean isEmpty();
int size();
}
|
During the review process many additional utility methods were added to DataUtilities in order to ensure all FeatureCollections handled things in a similar fashion.
Specific changes to functionality:
DataUtilities.visit( FeatureCollection, FeatureVisitor, ProgerssListener ) DataUtilities.bounds( FeatureCollection ) <-- already existed DataUtilities.bounds( FeatureIterator ) DataUtilities.count( FeatureCollection ) DataUtilities.count( FeatureIterator ) DataUtilities.close( Iterator ) DataUtilities.first( SimpleFeatureCollection ): SimpleFeature DataUtilities.first( FeatureCollection<?,F> ): F DataUtilities.list( FeatureCollection<?,F> ): List<F> // Already existed DataUtilities.list( FeatureCollection<?,F>, int ): List<F> DataUtilities.iterator( FeatureIterator ): Iterator // also Closable DataUtilities.collectionCast( FeatureCollection ): Collection |
Base FeatureCollection classes available for extending:
Working FetaureCollection implementations for day to day use in your own code:
Implementation specific FeatureCollection classes:
This proposal is the subject of a grass roots revolution on the geotools-devel list; indeed the revolution is on going and will not be televised.
Voting has not started yet:
The following documentation needs to be updated:
With the FeatureCollection.add method being removed, you will need to use an explicit instance that supports adding content.
BEFORE:
SimpleFeatureCollection features = FeatureCollections.newCollection();
for( SimpleFeature feature : list ){
features.add( feature );
} |
AFTER:
DefaultFeatureCollection features = new DefaultFeatureCollection();
for( SimpleFeature feature : list ){
features.add( feature );
} |
ALTERNATE (will throw exception if FeatureColleciton does not implement java.util.Collection )
Collection<SimpleFeature> collection = DataUtilities.collectionCast( featureCollection ); collection.addAll( list ); |
ALTERNATE DETAIL:
SimpleFeatureCollection features = FeatureCollections.newCollection();
if( features instanceof Collection ){
Collection<SimpleFeature> collection = (Collection) features;
collection.addAll( list );
}
else {
throw new IllegalStateException("FeatureCollections configured with immutbale implementation");
} |
The deprecated FeatureCollection.iterator() method is no longer available, please use FeatureCollection.features() as shown below.
BEFORE:
Iterator i=featureCollection.iterator();
try {
while( i.hasNext(); ){
SimpleFeature feature = i.next();
...
}
}
finally {
featureCollection.close( i );
} |
AFTER:
FeatureIterator i=featureCollection.features();
try {
while( i.hasNext(); ){
SimpleFeature feature = i.next();
...
}
}
finally {
i.close();
} |
JAVA7 (using try-with-resource):
try ( FeatureIterator i=featureCollection.features()){
while( i.hasNext() ){
SimpleFeature feature = i.next();
...
}
} |
We have made FeatureCollection implement closable (for Java 7 try-with-resource compatibility). This also provides an excellent replacement for FeatureCollection.close( Iterator ).
For other code that relied on FeatureCollection.close( Iterator ) to clean up after things, please make sure your Iterator implements Closeable.
BEFORE:
Iterator iterator = collection.iterator();
try {
...
} finally {
if (collection instanceof SimpleFeatureCollection) {
((SimpleFeatureCollection) collection).close(iterator);
}
} |
AFTER:
Iterator iterator = collection.iterator();
try {
...
} finally {
DataUtilities.close( iterator, collection );
} |
DETAIL:
Iterator iterator = collection.iterator();
try {
...
} finally {
if (iterator instanceof Closeable) {
try {
((Closeable)iterator).close();
}
catch( IOException e){
Logger log = Logger.getLogger( collection.getClass().getPackage().toString() );
log.log(Level.FINE, e.getMessage(), e );
}
}
} |
JAVA7: using try-with-resource syntax for iterators that implement Closeable
try ( FeatureIterator i=featureCollection.features()){
...
} |